A Poll, FSX Freeware Aircraft Wish List

[Paul Domingue]

Paul is there some way you can check the ISPs of some of these people voting for the Norseman. I don't recognize their names. I think it is a conspiracy and the same two guys are making up new names and opening accounts here at the Outhouse. Probably from Chicago..."Vote early and vote often."

RD

It must be a Canadian conspiracy!


This latest news, the Barrel has jumped into second place over the Defiant!

16	Noorduyn Norseman
9	Grumman F3F-2 Barrel
8	Boulton Paul Defiant
6	Cessna T-37 Tweet
3	de Havilland DHC-1 Chipmunk

[Naismith]

It must be a Canadian conspiracy!


This latest news, the Barrel has jumped into second place over the Defiant!

16	Noorduyn Norseman
9	Grumman F3F-2 Barrel
8	Boulton Paul Defiant
6	Cessna T-37 Tweet
3	de Havilland DHC-1 Chipmunk

We are nothing if not persistent

[rdaniell]

It must be a Canadian conspiracy!


This latest news, the Barrel has jumped into second place over the Defiant!

16	Noorduyn Norseman
9	Grumman F3F-2 Barrel
8	Boulton Paul Defiant
6	Cessna T-37 Tweet
3	de Havilland DHC-1 Chipmunk

I'd like to thank all my supporters as well as my campaign staff for all your efforts but, looks like I must concede the race. I'm waiting to see what offers I get before I endorse either of the top two candidates. This has been fun!

RD

[TheGrunt]

I already started to "get in the mood" by reading latest FlyPast magazine's Plane In Focus -articles about Defiant. Now it starts to seem, that I can't fly it virtually after all

Well, other possible options aren't bad, so maybe my mind will settle

[FSX68]

Changed my mind.

I think the Norseman will win and it's a nice looking A/C and if it should win that's O.K. by me; although the F3F looks to be in a distant second place,
I still choose the F3F Barrel as my choice (vote). :salute:

[Bjoern]

T-37
T-37
T-37
T-37
T-37
T-37
T-37
T-37
T-37
T-37
T-37
T-37

There, twelve votes for something less rustbuckety.

[Sieggie]

Paul is there some way you can check the ISPs of some of these people voting for the Norseman. I don't recognize their names. I think it is a conspiracy and the same two guys are making up new names and opening accounts here at the Outhouse. Probably from Chicago..."Vote early and vote often."

RD

Your thinking of Cincinnati, Chicago has the dead vote, but only once.

Dave

[Jozef Košík]

T-37
T-37
T-37
T-37
T-37
T-37
T-37
T-37
T-37
T-37
T-37
T-37

There, twelve votes for something less rustbuckety.

Here is already done http://flyawaysimulation.com/downloa...-37-dragonfly/

[FSX68]

Here is already done http://flyawaysimulation.com/downloa...-37-dragonfly/

Yeah, what he said ^

[skyhawka4m]

I think if the T-37 were to be done I would hop that the OA-37 variant would be part of it.....

Love me some PA ANG....

[Firekitten]

I wish people would stop putting suggestions down saying 'oh well its been done'... Yes, this is going to be an FSX NATIVE freeware project...

NONE of the aircraft people have said 'are done' are fsx native, or vaguely recent models. All are rather dated in fact hailing either from fs2002 or fs2004. Good in their times in most cases, thats not the point of this thread. Sure, argue the pros of your suggestion or vote, but quit with the 'oh some guy once made a 5 poly version of xyz airplane, thus we dont ever need one again'.

[rdaniell]

I think if the T-37 were to be done I would hop that the OA-37 variant would be part of it.....Love me some PA ANG....

Now that's one bad "Tweety Bird." Sylvester you better look out ole buddy. This little bird can kick your butt.

RD

[FSX68]

Now that's one bad "Tweety Bird." Sylvester you better look out ole buddy. This little bird can kick your butt.

RD

I think we will have your Tweet over a Barrel

[mmann]

We are nothing if not persistent

We Canucks sure are! If this had been an offer for an FSX aircraft carrier, we would all be behind the HMCS Bonaventure.

[Firekitten]

Did someone say Canadian aircraft carrier?

Attachment 90372

[Walter]

Did someone say Canadian aircraft carrier?

Attachment 90372

Time for some extreme STOL! Who wants to try? Step right on up!

[mmann]

The Swiss have the same problem!

Attachment 90376

[Paul Domingue]

I wish people would stop putting suggestions down saying 'oh well its been done'... Yes, this is going to be an FSX NATIVE freeware project...

NONE of the aircraft people have said 'are done' are fsx native, or vaguely recent models. All are rather dated in fact hailing either from fs2002 or fs2004. Good in their times in most cases, thats not the point of this thread. Sure, argue the pros of your suggestion or vote, but quit with the 'oh some guy once made a 5 poly version of xyz airplane, thus we dont ever need one again'.

At first I thought you just woke up on the wrong side of the bed but then......

Did someone say Canadian aircraft carrier?

Attachment 90372

I saw this and fell out of my chair.

Don't forget, I'm Canadian.

-------------------------------------------------
Defiant and Tweety struggling for 3rd place.

16	Noorduyn Norseman
9	Grumman F3F-2 Barrel
8	Boulton Paul Defiant
8	Cessna T-37 Tweet
3	de Havilland DHC-1 Chipmunk

[FSX68]

Attachment 90387

[huub vink]

Paul, I really think it is time to exclude the Canadians from this poll!

And back to my trench!

Huub

It must be a Canadian conspiracy!


This latest news, the Barrel has jumped into second place over the Defiant!

16	Noorduyn Norseman
9	Grumman F3F-2 Barrel
8	Boulton Paul Defiant
6	Cessna T-37 Tweet
3	de Havilland DHC-1 Chipmunk

[dhasdell]

On balance I think a Chipmunk, but the F3F is a close second.

If the Chipmunk has lost ground, I'll move to the F3F.

[nio]

to honour of the flightcrews, and in particular the gunners whose vulnerability to an attack from below or head on resulted in substantial losses , in this early WWII aircraft, I would vote for the BP Defiant.

best

nio

[Paul Domingue]

If the Chipmunk has lost ground, I'll move to the F3F.

Unfortunately once you vote it is counted and you can not vote again. But wait! there is more bad news. See the news flash.

[Paul Domingue]

This news just in.
The mud slinging has started. In an attempt to destroy each others credibility some candidates have resorted to low level comments about each other. Defiant came out with this statement in a press interview. "Where was Nerdy Noorduyn when trouble was brewing? Playing in the snow in Alaska and Greenland and hobnobbing with Bob Hope and his friends. That's where." In rebuttle Noorduyn said about Defiant; They took your turret off and invited you into the fray of the BoB but did you show up? No!" The Barrel said; "I'm staying out of the mud slinging. It's all in bad taste." and then did an immelman, his idea of an about face. We caught up with T-37 and when asked what he thought, T-37 said; "I tawt I taw a puddy tat." The Chipmunk said; "I'm taking my nuts and going home. I'm done and concede the race." So we are down to just four candidates battling it out.

16	Noorduyn Norseman
9	Boulton Paul Defiant
9	Grumman F3F-2 Barrel
8	Cessna T-37 Tweet

[Matt Wynn]

alright who's been buying votes?

no amount of produce could buy my vote for the Norseman... well that's not true... a Diemaco C8 will buy my vote


but come on, let's pull for the Defiant, it's an underdog, not massively known, but a very capable and adaptable aircraft, used by a fair few air forces RAF, RCAF, USAAC/F, RAAF..... besides with a Norseman you can't return fire if you're being chased across the Bush


back to seriousness *clears throat*.... anything that gets done Paul i'm likely to fly... prefer to have my aircraft with spinning blades OUTSIDE the engine nacelles though and boy is it good to see the community having a bit of a laugh!