<iframe width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/5UwclqMXivo?rel=0&hd=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>CAE's civil aviation visual demo of Tropos 6000 image generator.
<iframe width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/5UwclqMXivo?rel=0&hd=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>CAE's civil aviation visual demo of Tropos 6000 image generator.
I won´t see your signature.
Short of the water effects on the ground, FSX has it beat 10 fold for visuals.
IMO this would be better for the next FS graphics engine, probably too late for Flight. The water reflections and high resolution textures on the ground objects and runways do look good in the CAE video though.
<iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gf8YQ9WSdiw" allowfullscreen="" width="560" frameborder="0" height="349"></iframe>
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
I see a lot of really good potential in both.. tropo had great weather effects and the flight of birds looked extremely good. the sun was also quite good.
Fog simulation looks pretty neat. Objects are swaying in the water.
<iframe width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/JCRF_IIoDeE?rel=0&hd=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
I won´t see your signature.
Those are nice. I like the first and last one. I agree with the water comment; though the view by the bouy was great, leaving the oil rig - NOT so great. Now the BIG question ..... what kind of super computer does it take to run that baby as smoothly as their samples run?
Don
<iframe width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/wrsR1TGMUpo?rel=0&hd=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_mz7vdm02js?rel=0&hd=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/GRoXnglyo50?rel=0&hd=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
I won´t see your signature.
Bookmarks