Warbird Group, Anyone? - Page 2
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 65

Thread: Warbird Group, Anyone?

  1. #26
    To be honest, true formation flights on FS Host are nearly impossible due to server lag. For hardcore formation flights we would have to utilize gamespy.

  2. #27
    I'd like to try as well. I've never flown MS flight sims online before but would like to give it a go.

    I have many warbirds in my hangar from WWI to modern jets.

    -G-

  3. #28
    If anyone remembers the MB-339 from Lago (man I wish there was an FSX version of that), then you'll also remember that they released a "Formation Flight Module" soon after. It was hailed as the perfect way to learn formation flying. when the module was active, you were placed at the end of the rwy with the instructor directly ahead of you. The idea was to follow him through a series of maneuvers that over time as your progressed in ability, got more and more difficult, until finally, you graduated as a full fledged formation pilot. NOT, lol. The main flaw, which I realized right off and mentioned to Mathjis was that the lead pilot would take off and then without warning break in another direction. By the time you realized (even in a split second) that he was diverting, it was too late for you to find him, catch up and rejoin.

    Anyone who does serious formation flying for a team knows that all maneuvers are executed from the lead on a cadence. The lead doesn't simply begin any maneuver on his own without a call. That's what that module for the MB-339 didn't have and it eventually went the way of other good ideas that lacked the one ingredient to make them great.

    Loose formation flying, even at a distance, still requires at least two things: A constant heading and a constant altitude (being certain that your altimeter is set correctly too, lol). That way, everyone has the time to get into position and join up. It can be fun if you follow some basic rules.:salute:
    USAF Retired, 301st Fighter Wing, Carswell AFB, Texas
    My SOH Uploads: http://www.sim-outhouse.com/sohforum...erid=83&sort=d

    Current System Specs:
    FSX/Accel | Windows10 64bit
    Motherboard: MSI760GM-E51(MS-7596)
    CPU: 3.9GHz AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core | RAM: 16GB DDR3 1333
    GPU: NVidia GTX 970 (4GB GDDR5)

  4. #29
    Senior Administrator PRB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    MO (KSUS)
    Age
    62
    Posts
    9,410
    Quote Originally Posted by Kiwikat View Post
    To be honest, true formation flights on FS Host are nearly impossible due to server lag. For hardcore formation flights we would have to utilize gamespy.
    I don't know - we've done ok at times. It sometimes seems like the connection speed of the computer might have something to do with the severity of the lag. At least in our experience the lag is consistently worse or better with particular users. Of course this is FS9. I've never done MP in FSX.
    MB: GIGABYTE GA-X299 UD4 PRO ATX
    CPU: Intel(R) Core™ Processor i9-10900X Ten-Core 3.7GHz
    MEM: 64GB (8GBx8) DDR4/3000MHz Quad Channel
    GPU: RTX 3080 Ti 12GB GDDR6
    OS: Win 10 Pro 64bit
    HP Reverb G2

  5. #30
    I mentioned above that you need FSHost Client 1.1 to fly MP. . .that's only true if you fly FSX. If you intend to fly in FS9, the standard FSHost 3.2 is what you'll use. Sorry for the confusion (if there was any).
    USAF Retired, 301st Fighter Wing, Carswell AFB, Texas
    My SOH Uploads: http://www.sim-outhouse.com/sohforum...erid=83&sort=d

    Current System Specs:
    FSX/Accel | Windows10 64bit
    Motherboard: MSI760GM-E51(MS-7596)
    CPU: 3.9GHz AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core | RAM: 16GB DDR3 1333
    GPU: NVidia GTX 970 (4GB GDDR5)

  6. #31
    I am actually redoing the VWA or Virtual Warbird Association but its a FS9 VA should have site up soon.

  7. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by dswo View Post
    First, though, I need to configure the ports on my network. I've made several stabs at this and so far no joy.
    There's an excellent tutorial on the SOH.net forum(thats what I followed & it got me up & running in MP so it MUST be good!)

  8. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by NathanT28 View Post
    I am actually redoing the VWA or Virtual Warbird Association but its a FS9 VA should have site up soon.
    Yeah, FS9-based and VA are kind of out of the scope of this group. This is meant to be a casual group where we can get together and fly when we've got the time. Beyond that, there's no real specifics set.

    We need some more ideas!

  9. #34
    SOH-CM-2021 warchild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    Age
    72
    Posts
    5,466
    Blog Entries
    3
    Formation flying?? :;gulp:: Ummm ok,, hows this?/ I'll fly the zeppelin and you all can land on top of it and i'll fly us all around the world?? Thats formation isnt it?? ::lol::..

  10. #35
    a Warbird flying group sounds interesting count me in any idea if that will be more VA structured or just Large Warbird Fly Ins


    BR
    Tom

  11. #36
    Quote Originally Posted by Txmmy83 View Post
    a Warbird flying group sounds interesting count me in any idea if that will be more VA structured or just Large Warbird Fly Ins
    It won't be VA structured. I'd hope that most flights would be a group of 5 or 6 of us (maybe more on weekends) just flying around together. I've tried VA's and other more complex groups in the past and I didn't have fun with them at all.

    The around the world idea seems popular so far. It would be fun to do it with you guys!

  12. #37
    Some ideas, none original:

    1. MP carrier ops using mission (there's one for this already)

    2. MP carrier ops using player-driven carrier? (I don't know if the wires and cats will work in this mode though.)

    3. RAF base tour using member scenery

    4. Solomon Islands tours/missions using Mark's forthcoming scenery

    5. Reno-style air racing (Mustangs, Texans, L-39s, Spitfires, &c)

    6. Fighters form up with bombers, fly to target, fly back (woo hoo!)

    7. Screenshot scavenger hunt

    8. Skins vs. Shirts (I don't know what that means in this context, just trying to get up to ten)

    9. Limbo (what's the lowest bridge you can fly under without crashing?). Not sure where to play this...

    10. Aerial carrier ops using Piglet's ship or Robert Fitzgerald's "Ragtag Fugitive Fleet" scenery (Battlestar Galactica stationed over Honolulu).
    David Wilson-Okamura

    Nor law, nor duty bade me fight,
    Nor public men, nor cheering crowds,
    A lonely impulse of delight
    Drove to this tumult in the clouds.
    -- W. B. Yeats, "An Irish Airman Foresees His Death"

  13. #38
    On Another Planet
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Grinnell, Iowa
    Age
    31
    Posts
    648
    This sounds like a ton of fun! I am a huge warbird lover and this is exactly the kind of thing I have been looking for. Me and Kiwi and a few other pilots have been involved in warbird flights before and they are really fun. I hope this becomes a regular thing. Remember, all we need to do this is pilots!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Click my sig for my Flickr

  14. #39


    Is anyone else interested? We hope to begin operations within the next week or two.

  15. #40
    A few screen shots of last weeks very successful formation flight...enjoy!

    Attachment 4495Attachment 4498Attachment 4497Attachment 4496
    - Andrew

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  16. #41
    Quote Originally Posted by dswo View Post
    Some ideas, none original:



    6. Fighters form up with bombers, fly to target, fly back (woo hoo!)

    ...and the Luftwaffe joins in over the target area? :d
    Mathias


  17. #42
    On Another Planet
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Grinnell, Iowa
    Age
    31
    Posts
    648
    I agree. I think some intercept missions would be fun. A few B-17's and P-47's flying to a target, only to find a couple FW-190's and BF-109's waiting for them!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Click my sig for my Flickr

  18. #43
    Charter Member 2010
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Hampton, VA
    Posts
    1,389
    Blog Entries
    1
    We had a Me-109 on there with us that day, but it just appeared as a Cessna 172 for me. Looked weird having contrails off of a Cessna 172 as it buzzed by the windshield. Was definately fun. Think next time I may have to pull out the P-47D and do some escorting. The bomber while easy to fly on it's own I thought was a little hard to fly in close formation. Definately worth doing again and hopefully we can get some more people involved.
    Steve
    FSX Hours: 3000+

  19. #44
    How's that:
    Team A takes off South Coast Britain choosing one of two or three pre-defined destinations in France, each being, say, 30 miles apart from each other.
    Team B is to protect the "targets".
    Team B does not know which of the three targets will be approached by team A, also the teams are not allowed to split up formation while cruising and searching.
    Team A has won if it manages to cross the target without being jumped on by Team B.
    Team B has won if it manages to locate Team A and to get on the tail of each Team B aircraft within 100 yards or so.
    Mathias


  20. #45
    Charter Member 2022 srgalahad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    CYYC or MMSD (GMT -7)
    Posts
    5,080
    Guys,
    First of all I understand the differences between FS9 & FSX and of course, for those whom FSX is their first or only sim, some of the compatibility issues do make a difference. Certainly a gathering being FSX only has it's advantages and may even get converts.
    However, not every wheel needs to be reinvented.

    Currently there is a long-standing group (primarily FS9) that has done this sort of flying for ages and are on the SOH server most nights. "Flight 19" always creates a theme, then flys as many ongoing legs as required to flesh out the story line. Compatibility is more a matter of having fun than rules and it's an ongoing history lesson as well ( besides, you might convert some to TeamSpeak ). There will always be 'invisible aircraft' until everyone owns every plane but the fun is being together.

    As for the warbird style 'event' take a look at the beginning of the 2010 RTWR -
    http://www.fsrtwrace.com/rules.htm
    to see how it fits into something larger. We had 8 'pairs' airborne in the 2 1/2 hour period. This had "rules" because it was to accomplish a goal for the race, but was also a companionship-builder. The post-race celebration had over 20 aircraft from 4 forums crossing the channel
    http://www.sim-outhouse.com/sohforum...l=1#post364915
    (and a few German stragglers popping up when they could muster gas and pilots )

    While not intended as a mass, online group flight the recurring RTWR-style fun events hosted by SOH often turn into multiplayer travels (2008 Nobel Race around S. America, 2009 "Evita" Race to Argentina). Learning new planes, realistic flight ops (as opposed to balls-to-the-wall engine busting), navigation, geography, history all blend together in these. Even after the rebuild of the forums there are a lot of posts in the Around The World & Multiplayer forum from these and other gatherings. Some have 'rules' some are just an excuse to get together.
    Think about taking part in the upcoming SOH-hosted "The Pacific Rim Nifty 50s Jet Challenge" http://www.sim-outhouse.com/sohforum...l=1#post391724

    Two things I'll suggest... slip out of the FSX forum and explore the rest of the Outhouse, even just for inspiration, or to find something to participate in; get a couple of like-minded evil geniuses to suggest a theme for a one-time event:

    "Hmmm.. let's have a "Gathering of Mustangs" and ferry them from the factory to xxxx" -- or maybe the ATS Class 44A graduation flight from YYYY to ZZZZ in Texans ...

    once started I think you'll find it just grows - as long as you keep the public informed. As time goes on it could be an ongoing flight/mission over several days or weeks with the ability to pop-in/drop-out.

    Rob

    "To some the sky is the limit. To others it is home" anon.
    “Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new.” -Albert Einstein


  21. #46
    Retired SOH Administrator Henry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Shreveport LA
    Posts
    6,006
    Blog Entries
    4
    now i do have a few twin merlins that need exercise
    im in
    H
    DONT CRY WHEN YOU LOSE SOMEONE
    SMILE BECAUSE YOU KNEW THAT PERSON
    IN ABOOK!

  22. #47
    Count me in to.

    Ben
    SYSTEM: Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit |PSU - CoolMaster 1000Watt Gold edition |MoBo - Asus Sabertooth X79 |CPU - Intel i7 3930K OC (4.6 GHz) |Display - ATI Gigabyte 7970 HD |3X4GB G.Skill |Controls - TM HOTAS WARTHOG (Serial No. 4523) Saitek Rudder Pedals |TrackIR 4 Pro

  23. #48
    While joining the FS9 events are a good idea, I'm afraid I'd only be up for FSX events. I presume to use both FS9/FSX you'd have to use FSHost, which creates some serious lag issues which ruin my enjoyment of multiplayer (nothing more annoying that seeing planes darting across the sky like pond skaters). That and the fact that being able to download/buy the correct aircraft that FS9 users are using would be a major drawback, as some wouldn't be fully compatible with FSX, and the ensuing performance issues would bring my sim to its knees.

    That's not to say I'm stopping anyone else from joining in with the FS9 sessions - far from it! Just that I'm only really interested in such a group if it's a strictly FSX one.

  24. #49
    Nice to see this thread come to life again!

    Andy, how's the video coming?

    I've still got some screenies on my desktop that I need to post...

  25. #50
    Here are some of mine from that flight,unedited & straight from the sim as I was struggling to maintain formation,so not as good as Andy's. I must have taken 60+pics

Members who have read this thread: 0

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •