Short Stirling pic
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Short Stirling pic

  1. #1
    SOH-CM-2023 mongoose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Navigator, where are we?
    Age
    79
    Posts
    3,555

    Short Stirling pic

    Tribute to NachtPiloten's great model



    https://ibb.co/rkfmCXK

    Cato said "Carthaginem esse delendam"
    I say "Carthago iam diu deleta,sed enim Bellum Alium adhuc aedificandum est"

  2. #2
    SOH-CM-2024 Pat Pattle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Newton Abbot, Devon. Dear old Blighty
    Age
    60
    Posts
    2,907
    Blog Entries
    1
    Nice one James. My goodness that's a long way up!
    CFS3 Battle of Britain Website: https://cfs3bob.wixsite.com/cfs3-bob
    CFS3 ACC Member & ETO Expansion Group

  3. #3
    Member sixstrings5859's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Sulphur,South West Louisiana in the good'ol USA
    Age
    59
    Posts
    3,528
    Blog Entries
    1
    That's huge !!! Had no idea it was that high up !

  4. #4
    And the rest of the story.

    The stirling started life as the S.31 (better known as the M4), a half scale plywood model powered by four 90hp engines (very cute by aircraft standards), her chief designer did want a 112ft wingspan but the air ministry were having none of it, insisting on the 100ft still, which reduced range but also made the stirling maneuverable enough to earn it the nickname "The Fighting Bomber", it also hugely increased the lake off and landing runs.

    It was found with using the S.31 that an extra 3 degrees of wing incidence would hugely help the problem, and so the landing gear was lengthened to 23 feet to give the extra 3 degrees, hence all stirlings had the long legs.

    This wasn't the only problem, the landing gear was too long to retract into the nacelles! So a two stage system was introduced, first the gear was taken vertically upwards, then backwards, the motors for this process being inside the fuselage in case of a motor failure.

    This wasn't to be the stirling's last undercarriage problem though, the gear on the first full size prototype's first flight collapsed on landing! This was to do with the alloy used for the legs which was later replaced by steel, and the undercarriage problems were finally solved! so there you go, long legs= higher incidence.
    US Army, Major, Ret.

    Service To The Line,
    On The Line,
    On Time

    US Army Ordnance Corps.

  5. #5
    SOH-CM-2023 mongoose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Navigator, where are we?
    Age
    79
    Posts
    3,555

    Cato said "Carthaginem esse delendam"
    I say "Carthago iam diu deleta,sed enim Bellum Alium adhuc aedificandum est"

  6. #6
    Member sixstrings5859's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Sulphur,South West Louisiana in the good'ol USA
    Age
    59
    Posts
    3,528
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks for sharing Mongoose . Very interesting aircraft site, Regards, Scott

  7. #7
    Kurier auf Stube...pauke! NachtPiloten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Leland, North Carolina, USA
    Age
    66
    Posts
    2,007

    I had

    so much fun modeling the landing gear on that one.

Members who have read this thread: 55

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •