rendezvouz (i think that's right, can't spell)
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: rendezvouz (i think that's right, can't spell)

  1. #1
    andqui
    Guest

    rendezvouz (i think that's right, can't spell)

    this ties in to the other topic about the forming-up triangles, but i figured i might as well start a new thread.

    I've flown maybe 4 or 5 escort missions, not as lead, and I don't think I've seen my AI leader meat up with the 2-seaters. Is this the case for anyone? What usually happens is that the two-seaters are overhead when we take-off, but as we complete the laps around the fields, then they head out and I don't see them again for the rest of the mission. If this is a problem, then I thought i might bring it up in time for 1.3.

    On the other hand, I had my first gun jam today.... that's been modelled really well. good job.

  2. #2
    Grumpy123
    Guest
    I usually keep an eye on Flight 1 and the bombers in the TAC display and if they get ahead or start moving away to fast I just hit Next Waypoint (Shift+W) until our paths will meet again.

  3. #3
    ftgc
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Grumpy123 View Post
    I usually keep an eye on Flight 1 and the bombers in the TAC display and if they get ahead or start moving away to fast I just hit Next Waypoint (Shift+W) until our paths will meet again.
    But I think that only works if your the leader. If your flying as a wingman you can't "advance" the waypoints. Hence on of the reasons I fly "always lead"

    Scott

  4. #4
    Dirk98
    Guest
    Good info.

    Thanks,
    Dirk.

  5. #5
    catch22
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by andqui View Post
    I don't think I've seen my AI leader meat up with the 2-seaters. Is this the case for anyone? What usually happens is that the two-seaters are overhead when we take-off, but as we complete the laps around the fields, then they head out and I don't see them again for the rest of the mission.
    I can back you up on this. Not sure if it's related to 1.25 or what, but there's now an awful lot of circling waypoints over some airfields (like 8 -10 or more !) at the beginning of a campaign mission. If you follow all these the 2-seaters you're meant to escort are long gone. I don't recall seeing this prior to 1.25. IMO, circling the airfield twice/thrice to form up should be quite enough even close to the lines where gaining height on the outward bound waypoint above effective groundfire (2000 feet) should not be a problem. And if it is, it will be exciting whereas excessive forming up waypoints is dull imho.

  6. #6
    Dirk98
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by catch22 View Post
    IMO, circling the airfield twice/thrice to form up should be quite enough even close to the lines where gaining height on the outward bound waypoint above effective groundfire (2000 feet) should not be a problem.
    I hope WM will read this. It may remove some of his concerns regarding the necessaty of gaining enough altitude before crossing battle-front in the future patch.

    Thanks,
    Dirk.

Similar Threads

  1. This should keep you rascals busy for a spell
    By Cazzie in forum Ickie's NewsHawks
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: February 10th, 2013, 01:35
  2. Speckie spell check for IE
    By Ickie in forum Ickie's NewsHawks
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: September 23rd, 2012, 06:39
  3. How DO you spell Muammar el-Qaddafi?
    By n4gix in forum Ickie's NewsHawks
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: March 5th, 2011, 02:49

Members who have read this thread: 0

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •