PC graphics performance benchmark review
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: PC graphics performance benchmark review

  1. #1

    Icon4 PC graphics performance benchmark review

    https://www.guru3d.com/articles-page...-review,3.html

    System Spec



    • Core i9 9900K
    • Z390 (ASRock Tachi Ultimate)
    • 32 GB DDR4 3200 MHz CL16
    • NVMe M.2. SSD WD Black


    The graphics cards tested

    In this article, we'll make use of the following cards at a properly good PC experience graphics quality wise, the quality mode as shown above with Vsync disabled. The graphics cards used in this test are:


    1920x1080 (Full HD)2560x1440 (WQHD)3840x2160 (Ultra HD)

    • GeForce GTX 1060
    • GeForce GTX 1070
    • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
    • GeForce GTX 1080
    • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
    • GeForce GTX 1650 Super
    • GeForce GTX 1660
    • GeForce GTX 1660 Super
    • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
    • GeForce RTX 2060
    • GeForce RTX 2060 Super
    • GeForce RTX 2070
    • GeForce RTX 2070 Super
    • GeForce RTX 2080
    • GeForce RTX 2080 Super
    • GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
    • GeForce Titan Xp
    • Radeon RX 470
    • Radeon RX 480
    • Radeon RX 5500 XT (8GB)
    • Radeon RX 5600 XT
    • Radeon RX 570
    • Radeon RX 5700
    • Radeon RX 5700 XT
    • Radeon RX 580
    • Radeon RX 590
    • Radeon RX Vega 56
    • Radeon RX Vega 64
    • Radeon VII







    "Time is God's way of keeping everything from happening at once"





  2. #2
    SOH-CM-2024 FlameOut's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Copyright © Bill Campbell is the creator of the Weird-ohs
    Posts
    845
    Well I just don’t believe it! They put out benchmarks charts for us lowlife flightsim people! I’m glad to see that I’m right in the middle with my GTX 1080 regular video card... when I get my new PC build completed.

  3. #3
    About time Flight Sim got this much attention!

    Update August 19th
    :


    • added image quality screenshot comparison
    • added core CPU scaling results
    • added image quality settings performance comparison
    • added Core i9 9900K vs Ryzen 3800XT
    • added DRAM memory scaling, 16GB, 32GB, and 64GB.



    "Time is God's way of keeping everything from happening at once"





  4. #4
    Once the frantic rush is over (I can always wait a few days or months!) and I've convinced myself that the scenery is worth the aggro (ORBX are already producing additions!) I might give this a run.
    Very pleased to see my video specs are at the high end of the comparison.
    "Illegitimum non carborundum".

    Phanteks Enthoo Evolv X D-RGB Tempered Glass ATX Galaxy Silver
    Intel Core i9 10980XE Extreme Edition X
    ASUS ROG Rampage VI Extreme Encore MB
    Corsair Vengeance LPX 128GB (8x16GB), PC4-30400 (3800MHz) DDR4
    Corsair iCUE H100i ELITE CAPELLIX White Liquid CPU Cooler, 240mm Radiator, 2x ML120 RGB PWM Fans
    Samsung 4TB SSD, 860 PRO Series, 2.5" SATA III x4
    Corsair 1600W Titanium Series AX1600i Power Supply, 80 PLUS Titanium,
    ASUS 43inch ROG Swift 4K UHD G-Sync VA Gaming Monitor, 3840x2160, HDR 1000, 1ms, 144Hz,

  5. #5
    Excellent information in that article. Thanks for posting this! Apparently I need a new PC.
    Your English is better than my French, German, Italian, Spanish.... so no worries my friends!


  6. #6
    I wish there was a thread somewhere devoted to 'flying MSFS2020 using cached scenery' and the practicality of using cached scenery vs streaming everything in real time ?

    We can all build gaming 'rocketships' these days, ....... but if we're at the mercy of limited bandwidth, then we essentially cannot mimick the scenery quality MS has demonstrated.
    Cheers, MZee ...

    W11, Ryzen 9 7950X3D, GeForce RTX 4090 AERO OC, ROG Strix X670E-A Gaming, G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 CL30 AMD EXPO 32GB (2), Kraken Z73 360mm, Lian Li UniFan SL120 V2 (10), Samsung 990 PRO PCIe 4.0 NVMe 2TB (4), MEG Ai1300P, Lian Li O11D XL, Logitech Z906 5.1, T16000M FCS HOTAS, Xbox Controller, Acer Nitro XV282K 4K UHD LED.

    All white "Arctic" build.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by MZee1960 View Post
    I wish there was a thread somewhere devoted to 'flying MSFS2020 using cached scenery' and the practicality of using cached scenery vs streaming everything in real time ?

    We can all build gaming 'rocketships' these days, ....... but if we're at the mercy of limited bandwidth, then we essentially cannot mimic the scenery quality MS has demonstrated.
    I agree.

    But, the game has only been out a couple of days. And it will take a while for folk who have limited bandwidth to install the game. I have already seen a couple of articles touting the performance increase that can be had playing the game cached. I'm sure more info will be forthcoming over time.

    By which point, due to the massive demand in streaming and everyone now wanting to learn to fly because of and using MSFS, your area will get better bandwidth and you'll no longer have to worry

Members who have read this thread: 0

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •